Name of complainant: Which?
Date of complaint: 30 March 2011
Date of publication of the OFT response to complaint: 28 June 2011
Which? identified three features which it thought resulted in consumer detriment, in the passenger transport sector:
The OFT considers that payment surcharges are most likely to result in consumer detriment where they lack transparency and where consumers lack a practical way to avoid the surcharge, as the surcharges reduce the extent to which consumers shop around and compare full price offers. This weakens the competitive pressure between retailers and can result in consumers not getting the best deal.
We believe that making the headline price more meaningful for comparisons and ensuring information on surcharges is provided in a clear and timely manner would help consumers avoid surcharges and encourage competition between retailers, driving down the price of genuinely optional surcharges.
To address the concerns raised in the super-complaint we are recommending that the Government introduce measures to prohibit retailers from surcharging for debit cards to ensure a meaningful and consistent solution across the economy.
In the meantime, to tackle individual retailers whose practices we consider are resulting in significant consumer detriment, we will also seek to improve the presentation and transparency of payment surcharges in the passenger transport markets by taking action to ensure compliance with the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008.
We have re-published the original super-complaint response document. Following our consultation and in finalising this report, some text was deleted from Annexe C so that minor details were consistent with the views of the OFT as regards its investigations of the UK domestic interchange fee arrangements for MasterCard and Visa payment cards. In consequence, the numbering of some footnotes has been altered. None of the changes materially affected the OFT’s findings in this report or its decision not to make a Market Investigation Reference to the Competition Commission.
The OFT has taken the decision not to make a Market Investigation Reference (MIR) to the Competition Commission in response to the super-complaint. We invite views on this proposed decision and ask interested parties to submit responses to this consultation by 5pm on Tuesday 6 September 2011, either by email to email@example.com, or in writing to:
Surcharge Super-complaint (6th Floor)
Office of Fair Trading
2-6 Salisbury Square
Interested parties can submit their written views to firstname.lastname@example.org
Senior Responsible Officer: Cavendish Elithorn (020 7211 8170, email@example.com)
Project Director: Laura Phaff (020 7211 8701, firstname.lastname@example.org)
Team Leader: Pauline Goodship (020 7211 8335, email@example.com)
Back to: Super-complaints